Type into Google ‘beautiful naked
woman’ (yes, I actually Googled that) and immediately you’ll be bombarded with
images of women with no hair on their bodies.
With the exception of head hair
(which should be long and flowy), society (and Google) is continuously telling
women that no hair = sexy.
No arm hair, no leg hair, no hair
down there.
But where did this pressure come
from and why do we feel the need to spend so much $$$ on waxing, shaving and
laser treatment?
In 2003 The Economist published
an article about women with no hair ‘down there’. This was the beginning of the
hair free women-era and the youngest girl the hairdresser interviewed had waxed was 12.
TWELVE.
Back then they thought it might
have just been a fad. But here we are nine years later still doing the same
thing.
What is our culture coming to if
a TWELVE YEAR OLD feels the need to get waxed? Didn’t she only just hit puberty
blues?
Yes, women are supposed to be the
fairer sex and delicate creatures with soft and smooth skin but STILL.
Is it porn? Celebrities? Movies? Magazines?
The double standard? (of course
there’s one)
For men, hair = manly.
Bastards.
Bastards.
So what we can gather from this,
I guess, is that even though it’s completely natural to have body hair, you
shouldn’t have it (if you’re female) – and beauty is pain, right?
#YOLO.
No comments:
Post a Comment